Founding COO · EdTech venture · product, GTM & operations

Building a value loop from nothing

Most education software serves one customer — the student — which is exactly why it doesn’t last: the university never sees retention, the employer never sees a pipeline, so no one keeps paying for it. The six-month mandate was to design the opposite: a four-sided value loop where students, the university, and employers each gain, and each gain funds the next. There was no template for it. This is how it was built — and what held it together was running product, go-to-market, and operations as one motion, not three.

Worked against a real institutional analysis — Central Connecticut State University (New Britain, CT). CCSU figures are public record (IPEDS / U.S. Dept. of Education College Scorecard). Pilot outcomes are the engagement’s model; employer partners shown by sector.

01
The problem · why edtech doesn’t stick

One-sided products die

A platform that only helps the student creates no reason for anyone else to invest. The instinct is to add features. The actual fix is structural — make every party’s win depend on the next party’s win.

✕ The common model

Student-only tool. The university sees a cost, not retention. The employer sees nothing. Funding dries up; the product churns out.

↻ The model to build

A loop. Student gains drive university retention; retention produces an employer pipeline; employer investment funds richer student gains. Self-reinforcing.

02
The move · work backwards from each side’s outcome

Design the loop, not the features

Start from the outcome each side needs, then build only what produces it. Four parties means four outcomes — and the product is whatever closes the gap between them. Below, each node is a party; the line under it is the outcome it must get for the loop to turn.

S — Student
Builds identity
→ knows who they are & what they’re for (the leading signal)
U — University
Keeps the student
→ identity predicts persistence (retention & completion)
E — Employer
Gets a pipeline
→ graduates arrive matched (lower cost-per-hire)
↻ — Invest
Funds the loop
→ employer dollars fund identity (the cycle compounds)
the product is the connective tissue: four portals, one identity score, an early-warning view — each one exists only because an outcome demanded it
03
What it demanded · three threads, run as one

The loop only closes if product, GTM & ops move together

A four-sided loop can’t be handed off in pieces — the product design sets the pricing, the pricing sets what a university will commit to, and the operating model is what makes the pilot actually run. Holding all three at once was the job.

Product

The four portals

One front door per side of the loop — built around an identity score as the shared spine, with an early-warning view so retention can be acted on weeks ahead.

Go-to-market

A pilot a university would sign

The evidence case — the institution’s own outcome data plus a workforce-corridor ROI model — sized to a two-cohort pilot a risk-averse buyer could say yes to.

Operations

The model to run it

Pricing benchmarked across EdTech categories, the founding-team operating cadence, and the CRM & investor-pipeline discipline to keep the raise and the pilot on track.

three threads converge on one thing — a pilot that proves the loop turns
04
The proof · run against a real institution

Does the loop actually turn?

Modeled against CCSU’s real profile — ABET-accredited engineering, dual NSA cybersecurity designations, the region’s top teacher pipeline — scoped to the minimum that could run the loop end-to-end: two 12-week cohorts, 500 students.

>_ The pilot model — CCSU 2 cohorts · 12 weeks each · 500 students · Fall 2026 – Spring 2027
Identity score
66 → 80
the leading signal, baseline → end
Persistence
78.6% → 90%
real CCSU baseline → modeled composite
Employer investment
$310K
7 of 8 partners activate
Cost per hire
$3.8K
vs. ~$14K traditional · 34.5% conversion
Each metric maps to one side of the loop — identity (student) drives persistence (university), which yields a pipeline that converts at 34.5% (employer), justifying the $310K that funds the next turn. Employer partners enter by sector: Manufacturing · 60KState Government · 48KRegional Health · 37KAerospace · 2K

Reference implementation of the product strategy. CCSU institutional figures are public record (IPEDS / College Scorecard); pilot outcomes are the engagement’s bottoms-up model, not a live deployment. Named employer partners are shown by sector.